The stakes are too high to be careless of the facts, like Republicans are.
Factcheck.org has found that Representative Alan Grayson used manipulated video to make it appear that his opponent had said something he didn't say. Here is factcheck.org's summary of their finding:
We thought Democratic Rep. Alan Grayson of Florida reached a low point when he falsely accused his opponent of being a draft dodger during the Vietnam War, and of not loving his country. But now Grayson has lowered the bar even further. He’s using edited video to make his rival appear to be saying the opposite of what he really said.
In a new ad, Grayson accuses his Republican opponent Daniel Webster of being a religious fanatic and dubs him "Taliban Dan." But to make his case, Grayson manipulates a video clip to make it appear Webster was commanding wives to submit to their husbands, quoting a passage in the Bible. Four times, the ad shows Webster saying wives should submit to their husbands. In fact, Webster was cautioning husbands to avoid taking that passage as their own. The unedited quote is: "Don’t pick the ones [Bible verses] that say, ‘She should submit to me.’ "
The summary is followed by a lengthy analysis of the video and Webster's remarks, in context, and concludes:
Webster’s positions on abortion and marriage, and his religious views, are certainly fair game. But Grayson crosses the line when he uses manipulated video to cast Webster’s views in a false light, just as he did when he concocted a false accusation that Webster had been a Vietnam draft dodger.
3 comments:
But it really isn't as false as it sounds.
http://www.politicususa.com/en/tea-party-marriage
11:11, Webster may have disagreeable beliefs, but Grayson's people were wrong to use a manipulated video.
Factcheck.org's beef is with one point of the manipulated video:
Four times, the ad shows Webster saying wives should submit to their husbands. In fact, Webster was cautioning husbands to avoid taking that passage as their own. The unedited quote is: "Don’t pick the ones [Bible verses] that say, ‘She should submit to me.’ "
They didn't need to do that in order to make their point about "Taliban Dan."
While I'd agree that there are problems with selective editing (see ACORN defunding fiasco thanks to Brietbart et al), I think Jon Stewart did a better analysis of this situation in terms of providing the complete context of the guy's nutty beliefs which gave rise to the ad.
See the section on Taliban Dan:
http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/wed-september-29-2010-linda-polman
Post a Comment